I thought this was a food forum. Well, maybe there is something being cooked. (emoji of your choice goes here)
Your right! This is a food forum! It's hard not to keep going when we talk politics, I'm guilty of just that!
It is also a free country! This is a break for the moment
Okay, I want to talk food as our forum guidelines indicates, but if no moderator feels obliged to put this thread where it belongs I will add this as my "observation". The cherry-picked polls the “biased” media used usually showed Clinton with a majority of the popular vote. Well, guess what, she got the majority of the popular vote. It is the second time in my life that the candidate with the most popular votes lost the election. By its most basic definition, our democracy is not real; your vote doesn’t count and that has been proven now 5 times in our history. So do with it as you wish. But let's talk food.
Both candidates campaigned in the swing states that were up for grabs using the Electoral college. That is what wins elections not the popular vote. Has always been that way.
Not once did I see a commercial here in California for either candidate. Why is that? Hillary did not need to because she has the state locked in with electorial college votes. Trump would not gain enough votes to get the Electoral college share.
There were polls that had Hillary up by 12 points. Obviously that was not the case. One poll had Trump ahead by 5 points and then had him with 180 Electoral votes and Hillary with over 300. Again not even accurate.
Obama got 66 million votes. Neither Trump nor Hillary got that many. That means that many people who showed up for Obama did not show up for Clinton.
She did not inspire people to get out to vote like he did.
Get rid of the Electoral College and then the candidates will campaign for all the votes in all the states. Otherwise this is how our system works.