Let's Talk BBQ

General => General Discussion & Topics => General Discussion => Topic started by: fishingbouchman on August 30, 2013, 06:50:43 AM

Title: baby back vs spare
Post by: fishingbouchman on August 30, 2013, 06:50:43 AM
See a lot of you all making spare ribs so figured I would give it a shot.  have done them twice now and like the baby back better.  not sure if it is the texture, flavor, or I just don't cook them right.  I do like that they are more uniform but the baby backs just turn out better for me.   

Do you cook them differently? Why do you like spare's? 

Thx
Title: Re: baby back vs spare
Post by: sliding_billy on August 30, 2013, 07:00:27 AM
I am a spares guy (even though I am doing backs this weekend).  I like the flavor a lot better, and I think the fat to meat ratio is better yielding a moister product.  I do not do a St. Louis cut.  I like the tips attached.  The big difference cooking for me is that I don't need to wrap spares (and normally don't sauce them while cooking).  I always wrap/sauce backs.
Title: Re: baby back vs spare
Post by: Hub on August 30, 2013, 07:22:56 AM
For "friends and family" barbeque I usually buy whichever is on sale.  Stores in my area tend to have BB's on sale more often than spares.  I can't discern much difference in the texture of the meat.  BB racks tend to be a little more even in size from one end to the other.  My guests could care less about the "breed" -- they just want RIBS!!!

In competition we use ultra-trimmed St. Louis spares for appearance reasons, mostly.  Easy to make them very uniform.  A few BB's show up, but not many.

For non-competition spares I like to leave the flap meat on to get a really meaty rib.  They aren't pretty but the extra meat is great.

Try this if you can:  Whether BB or Spare, the ribs at most grocery stores are sealed in cryovac with some salt water, etc. for preservative reasons (longer shelf life).  Find a store or butcher shop that sells fresh, non-preservative ribs of either type and note the flavor and texture difference.  I think it is pretty dramatic and I greatly prefer the fresh rib "porkiness" to the preservative rib "hammy" flavor and texture.  Fresh ribs are almost never on sale, however  :(

Hub
Title: Re: baby back vs spare
Post by: pz on August 30, 2013, 02:50:56 PM
I'm like Hub in that I'll purchase whatever is the cheapest.  However, like sliding_billy I prefer spare, and I too like the cartilagenous tips.

Either kind I'll smoke, then wrap in foil (with butter and brown sugar, spices) and finish in the oven - I like fall-off-the-bone because quite frankly if I tried to do the proper "bite" as in competition, I'd end up with tough chewy ribs  ;D
Title: Re: baby back vs spare
Post by: LostArrow on August 30, 2013, 03:14:32 PM
I'm also a switch hitter ::)
I stock up on St.Louis spares when the price gets to $2.50/lb ( like today!)
Title: Re: baby back vs spare
Post by: sparky on August 30, 2013, 03:24:07 PM
I have cooked both.  I prefer bb backs.  spares are straighter bones and seem to cook good but a nice well smoked bb back is hard to beat.   8)
Title: baby back vs spare
Post by: Sam3 on August 30, 2013, 07:04:12 PM
I like BB myself, so does the Missus.
I buy meat when I need it, and I follow sparky's methods to a tee. It works in this house.
Title: Re: baby back vs spare
Post by: Smokin Don on August 30, 2013, 10:45:24 PM
I like both but probably prefer BB. Hub's right on when he says to use fresh ribs from a good butcher. The texture and taste are much better. Don
Title: Re: baby back vs spare
Post by: UWFSAE on August 30, 2013, 11:07:36 PM
I prefer spares to baby backs by a huge margin.  The Smokin-It #3 provides a very moist cooking environment and even baby backs can smoke unfoiled until done ... but spares, to me, have superior flavor and texture.  I think they stand up to stronger rub flavors and are versatile enough to cook as standard BBQ ribs or something a bit unique as Char Sui style Asian ribs.

I will occasionally pick up a rack of babys and always seem to regret it; spares seem more forgiving, are meatier, and have a beautiful marbling of fat in the thick end that renders incredible well.

To each their own, I suppose, but I like the firm bite of a well cooked slab of spares ...
Title: Re: baby back vs spare
Post by: fishingbouchman on September 01, 2013, 05:47:59 AM
I will have to give them a go again.  fresh ones.  Only used costco so far. 

THX
Title: Re: baby back vs spare
Post by: muebe on September 01, 2013, 07:26:11 AM
I love spares more than Baby Backs myself.

However a rack of Baby Backs would fit nicely in my crock pot :P
Title: Re: baby back vs spare
Post by: Sam3 on September 01, 2013, 07:42:03 AM
Well, after I posted, I decided to make some spares. No trimming, no foil love, just JH Pecan rub and on the MAK.  I think I will be making more spares from now on. These were real good!
(http://i120.photobucket.com/albums/o164/sam3_album/fede1449ddd8cdf2e5a23b07fffc034b_zps01092211.jpg)
Title: Re: baby back vs spare
Post by: RAD on September 01, 2013, 07:53:31 AM
9 out of 10 times it's spare ribs for me. And if you look at CAPTJack and Sam3 you'll know why.
Title: Re: baby back vs spare
Post by: muebe on September 01, 2013, 08:36:24 AM
Great looking rack!
Title: Re: baby back vs spare
Post by: Smokin Don on September 01, 2013, 09:24:19 AM
I will have to give them a go again.  fresh ones.  Only used costco so far. 

THX
Some that come cyropaced are fresh with no added brine you have to read close. There is one brand that I get at Sams, I think is Prairre but am not positive, that are fresh. Don